Best place to be drawnNo strong overall bias
Race type3yo+ handicaps
Sample period2024–2026
Key influenceBalanced distribution
What the pattern suggests
The winning stalls form an almost symmetrical pattern, with no consistent concentration towards the low, middle or high side. The historical sample therefore suggests that stall position alone offers little advantage.
How to read the chart
Each mark represents a winning stall number plotted against the total number of runners. This shows whether winners repeatedly cluster towards the low, middle or high side of the draw.
Historical winning-stall chart
|
WINNING STALL NUMBER | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | ||
| No
of R U N N E R S |
8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 111 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 9 | x | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 1 | H'caps Only 2024–2026 |
|||||||||||||
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| 11 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 12 | 11 | 1 | 111 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 13 | 1 | 1 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 20 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||
How to use the bias
- Pace: identify where the likely early leaders are drawn and which runners can secure a good position.
- Field size: give greater weight to the draw only where the historical pattern is strongest.
- Current conditions: recent track preparation and riding tactics can alter how much the historical bias matters.
Conclusion
The historical chart does not show a meaningful draw bias over six furlongs at Wolverhampton. Pace, early position and the individual runner’s ability are likely to be more useful than the stall number.
Related Wolverhampton analysis
Advertisement