Best place to be drawnLow in bigger fields
Race type3yo+ handicaps
Sample period2024–2026
Key influenceField size
What the pattern suggests
The overall chart is fairly balanced, but races with more than ten runners show a clearer advantage towards the lower-numbered stalls. In smaller fields the draw appears less important.
How to read the chart
Each mark represents a winning stall number plotted against the total number of runners. This shows whether winners repeatedly cluster towards the low, middle or high side of the draw.
Historical winning-stall chart
|
WINNING STALL NUMBER | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | ||
| No
of R U N N E R S |
8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 111 | ||||||||||||||||
| 9 | 111 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 111 | 111 | H'caps Only 2024–2026 |
|||||||||||||
| 10 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| 12 | 11 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 13 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 20 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 6 | ||||||||||
How to use the bias
- Pace: identify where the likely early leaders are drawn and which runners can secure a good position.
- Field size: give greater weight to the draw only where the historical pattern is strongest.
- Current conditions: recent track preparation and riding tactics can alter how much the historical bias matters.
Conclusion
There is no strong draw bias across every Wolverhampton five-furlong handicap. However, when the field contains more than ten runners, lower-numbered stalls have historically performed better and deserve extra consideration.
Related Wolverhampton analysis
Advertisement