Historical stall-position analysis for one mile races at Ayr, with separate markers for faster and softer going.

Ayr One Mile Draw Bias

Best place to be drawnNo strong overall bias
Race type3yo+ handicaps
SampleHistorical results
Key influencePace & going

What the pattern suggests

The historical evidence over one mile at Ayr does not show a meaningful draw bias. Stall position should therefore be treated as a secondary factor behind pace, going and the individual runner's race position.

How to read the chart

Each mark represents a winning stall number plotted against the total number of runners. This reveals whether winners repeatedly cluster towards the low, middle or high side.

Good or faster Good to soft or softer

The source chart covers horses aged three and older.

Historical winning-stall chart

WINNING STALL NUMBER



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
No

of

R

U

N

N

E

R

S

8  111 11  111 111   1 11 11111











9   1  111 11  1      1 1




3yr olds and older
H'caps Only
2024 - 2025


10 111  1   111
11  1   1  





11  1  1  1
 
 
 1
 111




12         11   1 111 11 11 1 1







13  1       11   1  111  
   1   1






14  11  1  1      1
 1
   11  







15    



              






16       
         

        




17      1              
       
 


18      1            
   
 
 



19                    1  

     
   
20      
1  
     


 
 





8 3 6 4 1 1
<--Good or better -->
8 3 5 1 4 6


23
27

How to use the bias

  • Pace: identify where the likely early leaders are drawn and where the field may congregate.
  • Going: consider whether one strip of the course is riding faster than another.
  • Field size: draw effects can become more important when runners are spread across a larger field.
  • Recent evidence: rail movements, watering and weather can alter the effective bias.

Conclusion

Over a mile at Ayr, there is no draw bias.

Related Ayr analysis

Advertisement